Welcome to the {KN} Kill Noobie Clan Forums!
Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
We hope you enjoy our servers enough to join us here and talk directly to us!

Feel free to register for our forums, take a seat, make yourself comfortable, stay awhile!

Shoot ya later!

{KN} Clan



Click HERE to reigister for our forums!

Username:   Password:
New Reply
Wood floor facing return
Topic Started: Apr 10 2016, 11:01 PM (89 Views)
meishengchao
Commander
Sentenced to pay huge royalties Times News (Reporter Ling Huishan) 337 preliminary investigation winning wood flooring business in China to a Dutch company.veranda coastal cedar US International Trade Commission (ITC) has finally ruled that 38 global companies in the United States sued the sales floor of patent infringement, including Dekor, Fillinger and SITA and other Chinese enterprises lost all 18 floors. Chinese exports to the United States to strengthen the wood flooring products ready to face the threat of the return.titan roof systems colorado composite US ITC final determination of these companies sold in the US infringe Netherlands Unilin flooring company, Irish and American industrial flooring Unilin flooring company in North Carolina floor lock patent.

It is understood that locking technology is a connection of the floor, the floor may improve the robustness of the joint, to achieve the overall floor exercise.principles of composite material mechanics solution It is understood that, in July 2005, said several foreign companies to "floor lock" Patent Infringement grounds, the ITC made a joint request to start the 337 survey on the implementation of a general exclusion order the infringing products, and the respondent companies illegal publication injunction.

At that time, Dekor, Sichuan SITA, Fillinger three giant wooden floors, use a program called TERBRAK Germany 40 years ago, the failure of floor lock technology (commonly known as "arc Rings"),wood powder and plastic hired American flooring experts Chicago and two engineering firms, according to this principle Bypass design a new product, was convicted of first instance, the product does not constitute infringement.
Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · General Discussion · Next Topic »
New Reply